Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brad Bolen who wrote (35460)	2/24/1999 3:04:00 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

You or anyone may indeed consider that it IS perjury. What's the beef? If you can't imagine that the public is capable of understanding the subtle nature of the point you tried to make, then you may sell them short. Regardless, my words were not misleading, if you understand them with logic in place. I'm having a hard time imagining you understand that my original post proved that I do indeed understand the "subtle point" you made. What's not subtle is that what the public believes about this President is quite real...whether they comprehend the technical ins and outs of legal perjury or not. This means to me that continuing to bash the messenger(Starr/Republicans) who brought a message the public accepts as true is not going to help the Democrats. It's just as tiring to hear this bashing as the whole impeachment mess was in the first place.