SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jopawa who wrote (16618)2/24/1999 4:44:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
John,

>>There are two other fallback options in Intel's road map, said Brian
Johnson, a member of MacWilliams' staff at the architecture labs. One
is the long-planned S-RIMM. An interface ASIC would reside on a
RIMM and would translate the Rambus signal levels of 1.0-to-1.8 V to
the 3.3-V CMOS signals used in the PC100 SDRAMs. That would allow
OEMs to use Rambus-type motherboards and RIMMs while using
SDRAMs as the memory-on-board. Then the S-RIMMs could be swapped
for the genuine RIMMs when the RDRAM supply picked up.<<

I don't know about you, unless I totally misunderstand the significance of this, I find that even entertaining this type of "fallback option" would hint at a very significant early demand. Otherwise, why not just wait it out. They're only talking 3 months....

bp



To: jopawa who wrote (16618)2/24/1999 7:32:00 PM
From: MileHigh  Respond to of 93625
 
Peter MacWilliams, an Intel Fellow at the Intel Architecture Labs (Hillsboro, Ore.) took a long-term view of the delay. It's "no big deal when you look at it from the perspective of where we are going over the next few years," he said.