Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (48723)	2/24/1999 6:10:00 PM
From: Michael Bakunin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Hey, was that your lot of 15 SCHRM? I bought one shortly after -- lucky timing.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (48723)	2/25/1999 10:25:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 132070

To All, I loved CNBS this morning. Jim Cramer had to admit that his performance hasn't been so hot. This answered a question I had long wondered about: if he was really doing the dumb things he said he was doing, how could he be outperforming. I am not talking about the 10 year record. I had never heard of him then. Maybe he did some smart things back then and maybe he will do some smart things again. But the stuff I have heard him talking about made no sense whatsoever and would have been lousy if he actually did them. My first thought was that he was only in the positions for a cup of coffee. That happens and is legitimate. But the WSJ published his #s today and we discovered that manic trading not the only disconnect. This is not really a knock on Cramer, though I have knocked him in the past, many times. It just clears up a mystery I have been wondering about. MB