Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (50851)	2/24/1999 6:30:00 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571546

Jim, It is odd, but we haven't heard much from Paul today. Maybe he isn't feeling quite so cocky. Scumbria

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (50851)	2/24/1999 6:42:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571546

<It means our resident process gurus, Yousef and Engle, who were bragging about the 1.8v Pentium III, weren't informed by their Intel sources that the P-III was actually 2.0v. And have egg on their faces again.> It's not that bad. At least Intel didn't have to jack up the voltage by two-tenths. And Intel even succeeded in keeping the increase in die size very minimal compared to the older Deschutes die. Tenchusatsu

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (50851)	2/24/1999 7:26:00 PM
From: Yousef	Respond to of 1571546

Jim, Re: "Which would tell us that Intel really hasn't pulled any further ahead in process technology..." Which is it, Jimmy ... First you say Intel is ahead, now you don't. Are your "chicken bones" starting to fail you ?? You should try to be a little more "consistent" in your AMD HYPE. <ggg> Make It So, Yousef