SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (35529)2/24/1999 9:53:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Apparently not to you. But then, you don't want it to make sense, do you? People like you saved this creep from the fate he deserved. Now you've got to live with it and justify it any way you can. Kind of like a whore looking in the mirror as the john hands her the fee? JLA



To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (35529)2/24/1999 10:18:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Did you see this interview? It isn't on yet in California. I have seen a clip they are showing on Geraldo. So far these are my comments - the crying looks phony to me, regardless of whether this happened or not. I think a more natural reaction for a woman that had been raped to the rapist 20 years ago is to get on TV and tell him to go to hell. Unless shes some meek dummy, but that isn't how they are portraying her. Also my other concern is that if she was truly a success, she would have filed something at that time. I don't care if it was 20 years ago or not, and then later, why file the affidavit?

My biggest problem is that a congressperson from Ca (Tom Campbell) who is supposed to be a law professor, claims that this flimsy evidence somehow influenced his impeachment vote. What a loser! He should move to Alabama, where his views are more appropriate. Can you imagine living in the police state that these guys would advocate if they could.