Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBL who wrote (35535)	2/24/1999 10:09:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 67261

That's a prerequisite to continued support of the scumbag, isn't it? Look at the company slickie keeps. JLA

To: JBL who wrote (35535)	2/24/1999 10:38:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Respond to of 67261

Now JBL, I respect you, I respect your views, but I must tell you that you really did not call Jonathan a strong enough name for my tastes. I have several better ones for you, but unfortunately (at least in this instance) I have foresworn the use of such terms. I so very much long to see folks on the left join with us here, and I mean this. For me it really has nothing at all to do with politics. I have reconciled myself to the fact that Clinton will finish his term. But Broaddrick or any of the other women who I believe were assaulted by Clinton (can all these women be the slutty liars the left claims they are?) are just everyday people. Broaddrick just owned a two bit funeral home for cryin out loud. An introduction to Clinton and her life is irrevocably damaged. The presidency has been remarkably damaged also. Any office that can hold a man with Clinton's reputation is no respectable office.

To: JBL who wrote (35535)	2/24/1999 11:04:00 PM
From: iandiareii	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

JBL, that's, like, so junior high. Just admit you've got a thing for J.D. -- you desperately want him for your sugarman -- and sweetly commence to the kissey-poo.

To: JBL who wrote (35535)	2/24/1999 11:04:00 PM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

JBL; this thing is over; dead dead dead. This was more weak than Paula Jones; that squeaky voiced nose-job phoney moron. At least Linda Tripp was a laugh-fest to watch and really quite entertaining to watch as I hater her for everything she is, but Paula Jones was unwatchable and I turned her off after 2 minutes. Broderick was more like Linda Tripp; laughable again. She was such a poor actress and had such a lame and phoney story it was at least entertaining. I want to see her really grilled by a good attorney though; one that doesn't just sit there like Dateline and let her go on unquestioned as she spouts implausibilities after implausibilities.