SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Perry LaForge who wrote (23398)2/24/1999 11:50:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 152472
 
I Post This Everynight It Seems (with joy)>

trading-ideas.com



To: Perry LaForge who wrote (23398)2/25/1999 12:15:00 AM
From: Ramsey Su  Respond to of 152472
 
Perry,

may be the WSJ is China's version of trial balloons. I hope CDMA does not end up being involved in this type of political football.

Ramsey

scmp.com

Thursday February 25 1999

Albright faces tough
questioning over satellite
sale ban

SIMON BECK in New York
US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright faces a
grilling from Chinese officials next week in the wake
of Washington's decision to block the sale of a satellite
to a PLA-linked consortium.

The Clinton administration said the refusal of a licence
for a US$450 million (HK$3.48 billion) deal involving
the Hughes satellite maker was a one-off ruling based
on national security fears - not a reversal of the policy
to co-operate on launches with Beijing.

But in the wake of the US Congress' probe of
unauthorised satellite technology leaks to Beijing, one
expert said the latest decision by the White House was
a milestone.

US officials are bracing for an angry reaction from
China, and possible retaliation in the form of cancelled
trade contracts.

State Department spokesman James Foley said of Ms
Albright's trip: "The Secretary will be in a position to
explain what the reasons were.

"I've reiterated our overall policy of allowing such
sales to go forward on a case-by-case basis. But they
must be consistent with US foreign policy and national
security interests and objectives.

"In this case, subject to review, we determined that the
purchasing body was not of a civilian nature."

Mr Foley said national security concerns were raised
after it became clear several entities linked to the PLA
were connected to the Asia-Pacific Mobile
Telecommunications Project, which ordered the Hughes
satellite.

Henry Sokolski, of the Non-Proliferation Policy Centre
in Washington, said: "This is an important milestone,
because we have never denied a satellite transfer to
China. Now there must be criteria to enable us to say
'no' again in the future."

But Clay Mowry, executive director of the Satellite
Industry Association, said: "All the to-do about Chinese
technology transfers and launches in China has meant
this is not good timing."

The Chinese Embassy in Washington said Beijing had
always "strictly adhered to the relevant agreements
regarding satellite launching" and China had no need
nor possibility of obtaining US technologies from the
launch of satellites.

Adding to tensions are new claims, citing Pentagon
sources and US intelligence reports, that Beijing has
been helping North Korea with its aerospace research -
help which might aid Pyongyang's missile programme.

Mr Foley said the administration was firmly opposed to
any nation co-operating with North Korea on space
technology.

White House spokesman Joe Lockhart said: "China has
given us assurances that they are not providing
assistance to the North Korean missile programme."