SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (38263)2/25/1999 8:08:00 AM
From: Crimson Ghost  Respond to of 95453
 




Low oil prices threaten US security
Journal of Commerce

Low oil prices today present grave economic and national security risks. There has been a gradual
decline of America's domestic oil industry over the past 15 years. Domestic drilling is nearly
extinct. The large numbers of marginal and stripper wells now shutting down across the country
produce small amounts individually, but their collective production equals U.S. imports from
Saudi Arabia. Those wells and undeveloped adjacent oil fields constitute America's true strategic
reserve. Today U.S. dependence on foreign oil is 56 percent, compared with only 36 percent in
1973 when the Arab oil embargo crippled the U.S. economy. The Energy Department's "strategic
oil reserve" stored in salt domes along the Gulf Coast, is inadequate insurance. That "strategic
reserve" would last only two months, if oil imports were cut by 50 percent.

Even a cursory knowledge of our energy history ought to remind consumers and lawmakers alike
that reliable supplies at steady prices are far better for our economy than cycling price plunges and
drastic spikes. Consumers now enjoying low gasoline and heating oil prices will experience
painful reverses once America's independent oil producers are history and OPEC is again calling
the tune.

In December, Luis Guisti, former chief of Venezuela's state oil company, happily predicted that
low prices would mean the disappearance of America's competing on-shore production in Ohio,
Wyoming, New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma and 23 other states.

Extremely low oil prices reduce the diversity of sources by driving all but the lowest-cost
production out of business. Oil imports become a dependency. Saudi Arabia, Iraq and the Persian
Gulf states are today's lowest-cost producers. They are also part of an historically unstable
region.

We seem already to have forgotten that the United States went to war in 1991 when Iraq's
invasion of Kuwait threatened world oil supplies. Saddam Hussein still aspires to rule the region
under the banner of Pan Arabism. Low prices and a continuing cash crunch for Saddam's
neighbors may also create an exploitable instability for Baghdad.

The Iraqi tyrant -- with United Nations assistance -- is a major contributor to the world oil glut.
That orchestrated surplus will drive the higher-cost producers from the business, and with them
the production cushion upon which price stability rests. Given the costs of exploration and
development, petroleum production and demand naturally tend to maintain a very close
equilibrium. There is today little crude oil inventory or excess production capacity. Price swings
of the proportion seen in the last 18 months occur when unanticipated political or economic
variables affect supply or demand. In 1973 the Arab oil embargo cut supply and radically drove
up prices. The firmer 1998 prices were driven down by the recession in Asia. The 1973 shortages
led to expanded exploration for new sources in the North Sea, Alaska, and Mexico. Today, in a
predictable reversal, exploration and development of oil and gas fields is being delayed around the
world because of the present abundance.

When Asia's recession reduced oil demand and prices, OPEC countries like Venezuela and Saudi
Arabia stepped-up production to replace lost revenue. This downward price pressure is
exacerbated by the Clinton administration's ill-conceived United Nations sanctions policy, which
since 1997 has allowed Iraq to sell $5.2 billion worth of oil every six months. Under this
sanction relief regime, Iraq is now exporting as much oil as it did before the Persian Gulf war.

UN Security Council Resolution 1153 allows Saddam to buy anything under the sun, except
items for his arsenal. Items for the arsenal are bought with hard cash earned through the export of
contraband Iraqi oil trucked across the Turkish border and on ships in the Gulf.

Not only do sanctions conceal the lack of an effective American policy, they also exacerbate the
instability of the world petroleum industry. The United Nations net-receipts formula for Iraqi
production effectively puts Iraq outside OPEC. That organization, led by Venezuela and Saudi
Arabia, is ready to adjust supplies to a level that meets the stated U.S. objective of having diverse
sources of petroleum but Saddam Hussein is now the swing producer. He is the one actually
setting the price. It should shock everyone but the administration whose policy it is.

In order to insure America's energy security, two steps should be taken immediately. The Foreign
Relations Committee and the Energy and Natural Resources Committee should schedule joint
hearings on those foreign and domestic policies of the administration affecting our national
economic and energy security. The lack of serious coordination presents a long-term threat to
overall both military and economic security.

We should immediately suspend collection of all federal oil royalties on stripper and marginal
production until prices stabilize and a fairer royalty collection procedure can be introduced. The
precedent for this exists in the relief provided to deep offshore oil. The cost of this should be
minimal for if there is no industry there will be no royalties. The costs of failing to assure the
survival of the domestic on-shore industry are incalculable.

(Copyright 1999)

_____via IntellX_____

Publication Date: February 23, 1999
Powered by NewsReal's IndustryWatch



...back to top