Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (35596)	2/25/1999 3:08:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 67261

Dwight you completely misunderstood my point. I am not familiar with this Broadderick case. What little I know about it comes from talk shows over the last 2 days. What I was trying to say was, if this were a claim that came out tomorrow against say, John Maclaughlan (I'm choosing someone who has a bit of a reputation, like Clinton), then I would believe it hands down. The problem is that I have a history of sex-related charges being raised against Clinton that turn out to be nothing more than some right-wing extremists way of trying to enlighten the country on how far we've fallen morally since the good old days in the 50s when it sure was good to be a white male. Monica, the Starr report, Paula Jones were all cases that looked like they might have merit and then when you looked more closely (or even looked AT ALL), they turned out to be the product of some nutcase trying to make a crime out of something that was just stupid behavior. I am going to look into this Broadderick case closely before I make a judgement call.