Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 8bits who wrote (35597)	2/25/1999 1:24:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Well Nick, we can't have the trial right here and right now, so I'm not going to try to do that. Previously signed statements don't mean squat though. What's generally done is that the person can say they were coerced into it. no physical evidence, Kinda like what Slick told Lewinsky. Only one problem....and everyone knows what that problem was. Were there some incidents of other women attacked where a police report was filed? I don't understand the question. Does there have to be multiple rapes attributed to one person before the perp can be brought to justice?

To: 8bits who wrote (35597)	2/25/1999 1:40:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

"According to Walters, the Clinton lawyers helped write the affidavit, providing Walters with examples of previous statements filed by witnesses sympathetic to the president in the Jones case. Broaddrick signed the affidavit, denying that she had been assaulted by Clinton, on Jan. 2, 1998 Well well well, looky what the cat drug in! Some Clinton lawyers, putting their noses in places they don't belong. Surprise surprise! >>I think her previous signed statement that it never happened would kill the case in court,...