Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TopCat who wrote (53538)	2/25/1999 12:46:00 PM
From: s martin	Respond to of 55532

>>Welcome back.<< Great post Topcat but it looks as if Riley has banned himself from SI again. <g>

To: TopCat who wrote (53538)	2/25/1999 6:27:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

I did not come back to SI to get into a pissing match with certain nays. If any nay is trying to harass me with said posts, they will not be answered. The facts are that BOTH sides WERE RIGHT in this matter. 1. Fact, there was ILLEGAL naked shorting and selling going on by certain people and market makers in the RMIL market. (What the yeas have said all along.) 2. Fact, there appears to be evidence of the RMIL BOD's laundering stock through certain people and companies. (Something that Tonto and I both uncovered in the last few weeks.) 3. Fact, the RMIL BOD's appears to be a total FRAUD and SCAM. (Something that the nays have said all along.)(See press releases and sec filings.) 4. Fact, My shareholder list that I worked to get off of the internet is correct to the best of my knowledge. 5. Fact, TONTO had a certain early OFFICIAL 1997 shareholder list from an unnamed source. Once Tonto shared certain facts from that list to me when I called him weeks ago, we both saw were the initial conflicts related to the share amounts came from. Tonto's list and mine are completely different, and from the list that he had, both Tonto and I began to uncover the players from within RMIL that appear to have laundered stock and through whom it was done. 6. The above evidence has been handled over to the proper authorities by Tonto and myself. Anyone that has a problem with this should just move along, as that's all I am posting (for know) about this. The facts are that Mork appears to be the lessor of two evils and shareholders wanting some sort of lawsuit should contact him to be added as a plaintiff in his civil suit. It is the only one going against RMIL..... Riley G RMIL Stock Activist psicop.com

To: TopCat who wrote (53538)	2/25/1999 10:03:00 PM
From: Angel D	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

TC, Nice to see that you are up and about. It's really surprising to see that you are "taking on" a man instead of bashing female posters, as is your usual habit. I could go over to "Raging Bull" and discuss your problems, but I would rather get the problems resolved here. I have spoken to Riley and Pugs, personally. I feel that your indictment of Riley is totally without merit. (Read between the lines, boy). Riley is, has been, and continues to be the single rallying point for the shareholders. I believe him to be to be everything that he says he is. That includes the good, the bad, and the sometimes laughable. He makes mistakes, just as we all do. However, I do believe that he has been honest with his friends, of which I consider myself one. He may have been wrong on several occassions, but I do believe that he is honest in what he is trying to do. I'm sure that you and your "computer geek" buddies also feel that you are being honest in what you are trying to do. However, are you trying to screw the company at the expense of the shareholders, are you trying to screw the shareholders, do you care any more who you screw, etc.? I have to say to you the same thing that I said to "s", i.e., "If you're not part of the solution, then you must be part of the problem". Which is it that you wish to be? The rest of us are trying to solve a problem. :) AD