Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MythMan who wrote (21464)	2/25/1999 10:11:00 AM
From: Lucretius	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

don't know, I'd expect a move at any time. I have decided to stick w/ buying trash. Creamer says that's the best thing to do, and he knows. -g- can you believe this mkt, nothing is bringing this POS down.

To: MythMan who wrote (21464)	2/25/1999 10:12:00 AM
From: Cynic 2005	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

Re. gold - you will get the answer. Put this one #reply-8024685 together with this one: <<REP PAUL: ''Even if central banks are willing to sell gold, what is their motivation?'' GREENSPAN: ''They are not doing it to fix the gold price. They are looking to sell stock of gold when they've sold on the grounds that 1) it costs to store the gold and 2) it didn't obtain any interest. So, they perceived it to be a poor asset to hold. The purpose was not to manipulate the price of gold.''>> My take: Incremental cost of storing gold is zip, unless of course they want to sell all of it. Obtain interest? Since when central banks have become per profit operations?