Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The 56 Point TA; Charts With an Attitude -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ACAN who wrote (26759)	2/25/1999 3:47:00 PM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 79306

Allan, GEMS A couple days ago Ivan posted that he would be incommunicado today and tomorrow. He's gonna hate it alright. Doug R

To: ACAN who wrote (26759)	2/26/1999 10:50:00 AM
From: ivan solotaroff	Respond to of 79306

GEMS -- EDIT Allan, I don't see the gap. It Este-catted (gapped a minor amount, then closed 18% lower for the day) in July. Este-cats behave less trustily than cats, and one that Este-gapped only 18% really doesn't qualify. Am I missing some other gap date? Ivan EDIT: Oops, just saw the gap back in '96. Hmm. Let me get back to you; it's been a long time since I played a cat this old, if ever. Needs some thought.

To: ACAN who wrote (26759)	2/26/1999 11:15:00 AM
From: ivan solotaroff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 79306

GEMS/ALF Allan, I've been studying GEMS' signal history for a bit. Not many, given the amount of time it's been taking up space in the cathouse. I don't think there's much downside risk, but I have no idea what the upside target would be. I'd be more inclined to go with ALF, which gave a good signal yesterday, in its 16th day as a card-carrier. I was following it on the phone from 3:30 pm yesterday, and didn't buy when the new ask of 7/16 generated almost zero activity; that, along with the general scariness of the market these days. Both look still playable. Ivan