To: Tim Callaghan who wrote (970 ) 2/26/1999 9:12:00 AM From: ztect Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1541
Tim..you're being silly, yet again....besides you have some explaining to do... Per an earlier post I asked you,127.0.0.1 :3456/SI/~wsapi/investor/reply-8028768 Therefore, Tim, please explain to me how GTCI...your speculative investment...is going to realize the earning promulgated by WSRG ($0.69 EPS in '99)...based on the existing market conditions (costs of services for telephony & ISp access in relationship to the disposable income of Chinese, use of the internets, 14,000 other ISP's, and outside competition, let alone government intervention) TODAY. Also Tim, please explain that the y2k as a problem deals with mainframes, embedded chips, pc's (primarily pre-97) and especially software. Meaning that whatever catastrophic and inflated hyperbole that you and WSRG (working for?) wish to plagiarize has little or nothing to do with GTCI's pc hardware fix...which btw requires the pc to be re-booted 8 or 9 times! Tim....your inability to stay focused on issues pertaining to GTCI makes me believe that you'll believe any thing that IR has to say. Plus, like I said at the top of this message, your accusations as they pertain to "my agenda" are just plain INANE. Sincerely, ztect. btw...I talk to companies and IR all the time...note my recent posts on DIXS and my six part report of my meeting with the COO and head of PR for PNLK posted in the Cyberian Gulag. I have a lot of experience making such contacts, so I can pretty quickly tell when making such efforts are worth the time or not....Tim, if you forgot....an IR's purpose is to SELL a company to share holders.... However, per the use of WSRG and paid TV and radio advertising, it is obvious to me that GTCI is more interested in pumping its share price than building its business.