Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (35906)	2/25/1999 11:00:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Unfounded? The man is a PROVEN sexual predator.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (35906)	2/25/1999 11:15:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

>You mistakenly assume that the attacks on Clinton begin a year ago. His actions were a natural response to the 6 years of unfounded harrassment.< I do not assume this. I do not assume he was “harassed” without cause. You do, and this merely reflects your leftward bias. Surely those who “harassed” him would claim he “harassed” them first. And this would merely reflect their rightward bias. It is the war, my friend, and these judgements of both yours and theirs are but subjective determinations. In the larger context, thinking people must dismiss such things because they are not facts. They are subjective. >To take one action out of context is not representative< What is not subjective is that Clinton lied repeatedly and flagrantly to the American people and to their judicial system. His 6 years of so-called “unfounded harassment” is no principled justification for this. To put it simply, you cannot excuse Clinton's wrongs simply because of Clinton's political enemies. Therefore contrary to your claims, I do not err in focusing upon this issue.