Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Walsh who wrote (9556)	2/26/1999 9:00:00 AM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Bob, it could, but if they go the smelting route, but why bother? You would use particle size reduction if you were leaching and trying to get to deep seated "goodies", but if the whole mass is molten, these goodies should be released anyway. Zeev

To: Bob Walsh who wrote (9556)	2/26/1999 9:02:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Bob, I find <<A total of 8 different ores were sent to a third party for concentration. The methods used are standard for placer ores.>> from McKay's report particularly interesting. We have believed that these desert dirt ores didn't lend themselves to conventional concentration. Remember IPM's bulk test and Maxam concentrator failures? To even conduct this test at this time suggests to me that there may be something more conventional than what we have been lead to believe from previous information. Success with these tests may allow conventional precious metal mining practice, easy mining income IMO. McKay!!!!!!!!!!, I'M FINDING A LOTS OF POTENTIALLY MARKET MOVING INFORMATION IN YOUR REPORT, INFORMATION THAT SHOULD APPRECIATE THE STOCK. DON'T' BE SHY, PUT OUT A BUSINESSWIRE PRESS RELEASE CONTAINING THIS INFORMATION AND STATUS.