SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (74593)2/26/1999 1:39:00 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Dear Scumbria: So it is your contention then that the US GOVT should penalize successful companies which have the foresight and intelligence to accumulate a hoard of cash? JDN



To: Scumbria who wrote (74593)2/26/1999 2:01:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Respond to of 186894
 
S, >>>I will repeat my earlier assertion- Intel has the cash to put AMD and NSM out of
the CPU business.<<<

If they are that weak, they'll be gone before anything is done, because the gummint takes so long. Precedent: Memorex and Calcomp vs. IBM. Darwin rules.

Tony



To: Scumbria who wrote (74593)2/26/1999 8:32:00 PM
From: nihil  Respond to of 186894
 
Protect competition You don't want FTC to protect competition, you want it to protect competitors. When AMD destroys itself by keeping prices under cost and the competition, it cannot expect FTC to protect it. If it has sold at cost and Intel undercut AMD's cost, they and FTC might have a case. With the facts as they are, the law is clear. Even a monopolist is allowed to meet competitive prices. It's the law. Look it up!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News