Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Forthright who wrote (20215)	2/26/1999 4:19:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

...Federal Courts have inherent power to impose sanctions against both attorneys and parties in "bad faith" conduct in litigation. Chambers v. NASCO Inc. 501 U.S. 32, 43, III S. Ct. 2123, 2132 (1991); Broadway Express, Inc., v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752, 764-766, 100 S.CT. 2455, 2463-2464 (1980). The court's inherent powers "are governed not by rule or statute but by the control necessarily vested in courts to manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases. Chambers, 501 U.S. at 43, III S.CT. at 2132. Inherent powers include powers arising from Article III, powers arising from the nature of the court, and powers arising from historical notions of the courts of equity In re Tutu Wells Contaminations Litig., 120 F.3d, 368, 384 (3rd Cir. 1997).... There's naturally a great deal more here, but why should I bother to transcribe it all? The Stooges are only marginally literate, doesn't really seem worth the trouble...