Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Cat who wrote (1070)	2/26/1999 5:00:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

<<Either way, for a barn-burner or going south, there will be a bomb shell.>> In that sense I agee with you.. MCE in early-mid March.

To: Tom Cat who wrote (1070)	3/3/1999 5:44:00 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 5821

I can see it now. "3 feet of disseminated sulphides in hole 99-2. Hole 99-2 overshot the target and holes 99-3 to 99-10 returned inconclusive results. Hole 99-9 had a strong offhole anomaly that the consultants tell us is high probability sulphide conductor. NWI is weighing its options and when all the results are assessed will announce its intentions with regards to the property. In the meantime work is underway on targets 2 through 6 and results of the geophysical program will be announced when they are ready." That is the overwhelming probability but you never know. I have heard more BS about this deposit than any in recent memory. It has all the earmarks of a small deposit in fact. Geophysics, particularly IP, is totally untrustworthy in delineation of the size or grade of a deposit. It is more likely the mag that could tell you how big it is but there may not be enough pyrrhotite for that. Remember there is only 10 feet of massive sulphide in this one. It is no Frood Stobie. If it were a large deposit, the the cystallization in core would indicate that. And geophysical signature would stand out like a sore thumb, both mag and TDEM conductivity, and you could see it on the gov't maps from the GSC. EC<:-}