Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CTSL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (1255)	2/27/1999 5:32:00 PM
From: Cheryl Galt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1354

>> I hate it when WSJ reports without balance. Yes, they pointed at the lousy performance, but they didn't point to the truth in response to his biotech excuses...... his picks have been amateurish. << Rick, I'd like to see you write a letter to the editor. The WSJ interviewed Murphy, who self-analyzed his own poor analyst performance --- then for current analysis, rambled that for a "way out" of his performance problems, he was "thinking about cutting back" on the small biotechs in his funds. (How's that for astute, decisive analysis?!) I believe the WSJ would be willing to look beyond Murphy, to get a second analyst's opinion --- in fairness to the sector. Cheryl