SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (49154)2/26/1999 8:51:00 PM
From: Alias Shrugged  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Mike

Other stocks were strong. This would be a good thing<gggg>

The lambs are "in for the long haul," so no selling off of the S&P, just the techs which "gotta a little ahead of themselves." (WTF does that mean anyway?)

Anyway, so they smack the techs down and prop the other stuff up, making puts on "Fluff, Part Deux" most reasonable! I have 1/2 position on PVN, 1/3rd on SCH. Let's hope I can take most of my profits on techs (MU, XLNX, AMAT) before they take the puts on the other stuff off the sale rack.

PS - can you tell I'm in a good mood tonite????<gg>

Mike



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (49154)2/27/1999 8:54:00 AM
From: wlheatmoon  Respond to of 132070
 
yeah, would you please put a stickpin into PVN and SCH dolls?



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (49154)2/27/1999 10:37:00 AM
From: bob s  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 132070
 
MB-Do you feel it's too risky to short EBAY with the split about too occur? The market cap is about 13 billion. Bob



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (49154)2/27/1999 4:44:00 PM
From: SeaViewer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
MB:

If you look at the PE and growth ratio, SCH is more overvalued than DELL. I have some Jun40 puts, what do you think about Apr70 or Apr 65 puts?

Thanks!

Jeff



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (49154)2/27/1999 5:43:00 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Why does SCH stock go up with their system down -- that has to eat into revenues for at least that one day --- or is the thought they couldn't lose much more because daytraders losing their butts on margin weren't buying any more for the time being? <VBG>