Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Forrest who wrote (5869)	2/27/1999 7:33:00 AM
From: tang	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41369

Michelle, who cares the article is a month old or not (it was dated 2/26/99! not an old article to me!), *as long as the article is positive to AOL.* I don't mind reading it. Keeps on digging!!!!!

To: Ed Forrest who wrote (5869)	2/27/1999 11:52:00 AM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Respond to of 41369

Ed, thats interesting... I know papers sometimes dig up old archive pieces from Routers etc. but I would have thought this was ok because it was dated Feb. 26 by a "Chronicle Staff Writer". Well, go figure. But heres something interesting about spam, not really related to AOL - This message is sent in compliance of the new e-mail bill: SECTION 301. Per Section 301, Paragraph (a)(2)(C) of S. 1618, senate.gov Further transmissions to you by the sender of this email may be stopped at no cost to you by sending a reply to this email address with the word "remove" in the subject line. I don't think the link works, but it looks like spam now has to conform to a new email spam bill where a reply with "remove" actually removes you from their list. I used to not do that because I read that replying to any spam just dug you in deeper. Hoorah for legislation and government in this case! Michelle