Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JMD who wrote (23500)	2/26/1999 11:58:00 PM
From: Jon Koplik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Regarding Gregg's (temporary ?) silence -- this is probably NOT what Gregg wanted to happen, but ... personally, I cannot think of any more bullish indication for Qualcomm than Gregg's continued "no comment." Jon.

To: JMD who wrote (23500)	2/27/1999 12:17:00 AM
From: Valueman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Now, let's ask: does this make any freaking sense at all? Given the exigencies of the times, couldn't Gregg--or any other institutional investor--just start off his posts with some "look folks, I own a shit load of shares (or I'm short a shit load of shares)" disclaimer and then go on to say what he thinks? I know it's awfully simple, but aside from that, what's the the problem with this approach? uuuuhhhhhh.....no comment P.S. I own a minimal number of shares when viewed in a macro sense