Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Reuben who wrote (17016)	2/27/1999 9:10:00 AM
From: t2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

What reason could you give b4 the trial started to change judges? I wonder if the same rules apply to the appeals court--we will see the same panel who overturned the last decision.

To: Paul Reuben who wrote (17016)	2/27/1999 11:54:00 PM
From: Paul Reuben	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74651

Closing arguments in the non-jury case are scheduled for Friday in Washington's U.S. District Court. Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson heard testimony in August but put the matter on hold to preside over the antitrust trial of Microsoft Corp. Jackson has already ruled against the Moores' request to be compensated for so-called lost profits previously estimated at almost $1.8 million--money they say they would have earned if they didn't have to take so much time away from their audio-visual services business, Techniarts Engineering, to coordinate their daughter's care. The Moores' lawyer has asked Jackson to reconsider. washingtonpost.com