SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DRBES who wrote (51185)2/27/1999 11:53:00 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1570897
 
Re: (Speaking of Intel lowering prices to recapture market share) "This strategy would, no doubt, succeed. However it is illegal. "

I see you too suffer from this delusion. It is not illegal to pass on the affects of manufacturing efficiency to your customers, especially in the face of predatory pricing from AMD. You guys kept claiming that AMD would keep Intel's pricing lower and now you got what you kept asking for. The fact that Intel's competition cannot achieve the same low product costs does not make Intel's pricing illegal. Try as you and Scumbria may, you can't just repeat this over and over and make it true. Funny how Intel can pass on their success to their customers and you scream, while AMD passes on their failures to their shareholders and you drop your pants and line up for more.

EP



To: DRBES who wrote (51185)2/27/1999 5:13:00 PM
From: Trey McAtee  Respond to of 1570897
 
drbes--

sure, maybe the government would have problems with it. maybe they wouldnt. depends on a lot of things.

but, the fact remains thats the only winning strategy. this segmentation strategy is stupid. the things are going now, AMD is only going to get stronger.

which, considering i am long the stock, i happen to like<G>.

good luck to all,
trey



To: DRBES who wrote (51185)3/1/1999 10:12:00 AM
From: d e conway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570897
 
DRBES re << the only option left [for INTEL] is to cut celeron and drop the prices on P2's and P3's down to match AMD......However it is illegal >>

By precedent, it would be illegal (as PREDATORY PRICING) only if it can be proved they priced below their marginal variable cost (not so easy to prove) ...specifically in order to injure the competition (maybe more easily proved by history and circumstance).

Make It Grow,
Dan