Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (74731)	2/27/1999 1:41:00 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Amy, The term commonly used by ex-Intel employees is that they are expected to work "within the box". Scumbria

To: Amy J who wrote (74731)	2/28/1999 7:04:00 PM
From: nihil	Respond to of 186894

Intel tries to do both .... Very wise comment, Amy J. Scarcely anyone has been dominant in production and also creative. The Lexus is an amazing lesson. But the modern corporation has to learn both, and Intel is a very good model. My understanding of why Noyce and Moore created it was that the suits had taken over Fairchild, and N&M wanted to reward the oxen that did the work. In 1997, Grove made it everyone. Its impossible to calculate exactly the right, just, fair reward, but Intel, Microsoft and very few others are pioneering in trying to do it well. It seems to work well so far. Ultimately every productive organization will reward all of its workers in proportion to their (approximate) contribution, or they will be driven out of business by the ones who do.