Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stefan who wrote (105617)	2/27/1999 7:31:00 PM
From: SirVinny	Respond to of 176387

Stefan, if I misunderstood you then I sincerely apologize. I hope there are no heart feelings. After-all we are both in this game to make money. In fact I thought our little exchange was amusing, especially your "call-girl" line and my "tit-from-twat" comeback. Having said that, my position is that it is perfectly understandable and acceptable that investors such as LONGonDELL, who wants the stock to go higher, and Michael Burke, who wants to see it go down will present arguments biased in accordance to their position. On the other hand, I see analysts as being referees. It is obvious that the average individual investor cannot decipher all the pertinent data. We therefore rely on opinions of these analysts to relay the facts. Their calls, in my opinion, should be unbiased without an Agenda to fill. They should present the facts objectively and not distort the information to suit a particular position. As I mentioned in one of my previous posts I'm looking into starting a website that will rate analysts based on their calls. The site will chart the stocks performance and compare it with the analyst's prediction. The goal of the rating system is to guide investors in their decision making. Hopefully, it will also help make analysts responsible for their calls. Best regards, SirVinny