Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles Hughes who wrote (22795)	2/27/1999 3:31:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24154

Chaz, re:4 INTERESTING--NO, IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, IF YOU LOOK AT 5 THE NEXT SENTENCE IN THE NEXT PARAGRAPH IT SAYS, "IF YOU 6 THINK WE SHOULD SUPPORT JDK 1.2, IT'S OKAY." SO THAT 7 DOESN'T SEEM-- Have you seen this email or do you know whats in it? I have only read the articles about the "judge yells at msft exec" issue. However to be fair, if there really is a statement like "if we support jdk1.2, its ok", then perhaps this does speak of a little testimony-driving by the judge. Michelle

To: Charles Hughes who wrote (22795)	2/28/1999 1:04:00 AM
From: Gerald R. Lampton	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24154

PPS: When the new organizations have leaders and they are going into negotiations to see who gets what for their survival and Bill is in there battling for all the gravy bits for his new organization - that will be one hell of a negotiation if it happens that way. If the gov doesn't set that one up right BG will screw them out of their socks. I hope the gov is careful about how the leadership is set up in advance, how these divisions happen, who knows where the keys and skeletons are and so forth. Bill has fiduciary obligations to his shareholders which are imposed by law. "Cherry-picking" the good people or products for his own company and deliberately leaving the others under funded or under capitalized would violate those fiduciary obligations. So, while there is certainly no assurance that the various divisions of your hypothetical breakup would start out as absolute equals, there is also no assurance that relying on government bureaucrats to divvy up Microsoft's physical assets and personnel would do a better job than the market. Your views as to Bill Gates' motivations for the reorganization of the company (which Ballmer, not Gates, actually instituted) and personal stock sales paint him in an especially bad light. I would be curious to know if they are based on anything more than speculation. Do you have sources telling you these things? If so, maybe you could make some news by telling us who or what they are. If not, if it's just your speculation, please make that fact clear.