Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (31766)	2/27/1999 6:53:00 PM
From: Ish	Respond to of 108807

<<Have you seen it now, Del? I think MSNBC replayed it several times. One of the most interesting things I read as the result is that Democratic Senator Tom Harkin said Friday that had he seen it before the impeachment vote, he might have voted for impeachment. This is total garbage, in my opinion, because all the senators and representatives had access to her story and the corroborating affidavits of the five people she told at the time it happened. >> No surprise, not one democratic Senator went to the evidence room. That's the "out", I never saw any evidence........

To: Grainne who wrote (31766)	2/28/1999 1:28:00 AM
From: Krowbar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

No, I haven't seen the Clinton rape tape. I probably won't, but my wife spends endless hours watching all of the talking head shows on this subject, and I'm not about to. I prefer to read what happens politically in the paper. The only TV that I usually watch is Discovery, The Learning channel, and occasional smut movies. BTW, I finally watched a whole movie without going bonkers. "Something about Mary". That was great! You kind of sidestepped the issue about late-term abortion for badly deformed fetuses. You already stated that you wouldn't abort. The question is, would you make it illegal for other women to choose abortion? What are the other alternatives to a family spending years caring for a severely retarded baby that doesn't respond, other than paying others to do that. If you ever visited one of those places you would not find very loving care. There was ironically an AP story in Saturday's paper about 6 doctors accused of abusing patients in a Pennsylvania home for the retarded, leading to the deaths of 3 patients over a 2 year period. Abuse is very common in these places. You are calling fetuses babies again. That is neither medically nor legally correct. That is a wrong wing tactic. Del