Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : WR, LB and Friends. NO HYPESTERS OR SCAMMERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Sirk who wrote (540)	2/27/1999 5:23:00 PM
From: Stuart Cole	Respond to of 13776

When I mentioned you in a generic nature. I am not specifically throwing darts in your direction. It is my feeling that anyone who is compensated to pump a stock is wrong. As I said, there is nothing wrong with spreading the wealth by talking positively about a stock. If you own a stock and would like others to own the stock so all can profit...great. But when someone pumps a sock for individual gain...this is wrong. I am new at this and don't recall if I have or have not read any of your posts. My comments weren't made against you specifically. If you are not guilty, don't worry. If you are, time will tell.

To: David Sirk who wrote (540)	2/27/1999 10:01:00 PM
From: Israel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13776

Could you please give me an example of a stock that if people would have bought when I told them to buy they would have got hurt? LTGL for one.... Even after I told you in MRIC that LTGL had the printing presses going 24-7, and that after visiting with Krum-scam I knew a reverse split of epic proportins was coming? Remember that little conversation Mofreal? Yet you continued to hype LTGL to high heaven. Speaking of blasting off at the key board before thinking.. geez.. Happy Trading, Israel... headed out for a night on South Beach