Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Audio and Radio on the Internet- NAVR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lynn who wrote (9278)	2/27/1999 5:22:00 PM
From: Annette	Respond to of 27722

I second the motion.

To: Lynn who wrote (9278)	2/28/1999 12:54:00 AM
From: stiltz1	Respond to of 27722

not necessarily: while it may have an effect of a quarter point or so: WE WILL GAIN MUCH MORE IN THE CONTEXT OF SHARES ALREADY OWNED. It will also demonstrate our collective pressure. For exmaple say you own a thousand shares, average cost: 15,000. you buy 100 at 17 ( say a price rise of a half a point over what you would have paid if no one were buying: you pay 1700. but the overall value of your thousand shares has risen to 17,000: you pay another $50 for that 100, but in so doing you increase the total value of your INVESTMENT by at least 500 ( assuming that if everyone had not been buying you could have bought that 100 shares at 16 1/2). Thus, the collective impact of all of our buying, let's say between 16 1/2 and 17 1/2, if price rises because of our pressure, enhances the overall value of all of the shares we own . It does make sense -- at least it makes plausibel sense and would AT THIS MOMENT IN NAVARRE'S PRICE LIFE -- to try the experiment. I would agree with you Lynn if ipo wat not imminent; but given its proximity, this strategy makes sense.