Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: taxgun who wrote (40820)	2/28/1999 6:35:00 AM
From: Steve Misic	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

Hey Joe, I see all my friends from Prodigy are here. Does this mean the Money Talk BB is gone? Steve

To: taxgun who wrote (40820)	2/28/1999 3:41:00 PM
From: Joe Pirate	Respond to of 41046

OT: Good riddiance to Jeff George ! Long live Rich Gannon !! Rahh rahhh rahhh rahh !!!! Pirate

To: taxgun who wrote (40820)	2/28/1999 7:42:00 PM
From: mark garner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

hey pakin & rose (old somethingoranother): u people r 2 funny. guilty until proven innocent? maybe u 2 should be quiet unless u know the facts. ofcourse that has never stopped either one of u b4. pakin: what about TMMI? rose:what about bre-hoax? were u 2 at fault for either of those debacles, or did u both get the wool pulled over your eyes after what u considered to be a fair amount of DD? how many posts did i read from u 2 about these 2 companies all over the place? were u 2 paid promoters? probably not, but if someone told the sec that u were, than u must have been, right? did either of u sell stock after u made positive comments about it in a public forum? your comments validate my previous opinions of the boat of u; your comments here speak volumes of your class.

To: taxgun who wrote (40820)	2/28/1999 10:36:00 PM
From: P.F.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

Hi JP, always good to hear from a neighbor. Don't know why I get riled by commentary like DA's-probably too much Friday nite scotch. It's kind of like stepping into something really disgusting and reacting before you have time to think. Anyhow sorry for the waste of space--my original point was if RB was being unfairly named as an accused, based on an Ohio address and a shared last name with this Roland, perhaps we should not make assumptions (plus as an ex-Clevlander I couldn't sit still for that spelling butchery of Cuyahoga). If in fact it is the same fellow known to so many here, then I suppose the facts will be brought out in court and a verdict rendered. Seems to me that's probably the best place for the battle over did he or didn't he to take place. In the meantime how's things with our investment.