Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : World Wide Web Casinos (Internet Casino/Sportsbook) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Judge Renq who wrote (445)	2/28/1999 6:48:00 PM
From: Judge Renq	Respond to of 688

It is only a matter of time before PM is in court again fighting his way out of additional deceitful charges pending against him in the supreme court of California. As an attorney representing a class of over 10 members/shareholders that disagree with the settlement proposal, I suggest that MR. PM, or PMS and most of us would characterize him, prepare for his second opportunity at looking at the world behind bars. His flighty atty got him out of trouble by settling, that says volumes about the both of them (remember any and all fees that he pays to his atty comes out of the original investment we all made) remember he has shown no documents to where all of the 18million dollars has disappeared to (the audit). Maybe those french paintings and houses and cars and trips to L.V. for his brother (and girlfriend) and mother Staying in the Rio Suites of course. We see that out of desperation to stay away from the menendez brothers, he made a settlement of 70K in atty's fees and 2 million in shares that a good many of them came from MR. Demos, who has relinquished his position and any further business relations with mr. M. The man who fraudulently racked up 70k in credit card charges on a pseudo acct to help pay for his employees paychecks (unbeknownst) to mr. demos, but now Mr. M. will soon be sued by American Express. Why WOULD PMS SETTLE if he was not guilty. Why would he drop his 200 million dollar counter claim against the plaintiffs if he had a foot to stand on (maybe and extra chin). Shareholdes, please prepare yourselves for fireworks of which you have never seen before and will never see again. Working with national agencies, commissions and international agencies, I assure you that as soon as he settles with Mr. Z, we will follow up immediately with a surprise suit that will make his mother rename his son Michael Michaels to Michelle. (really, who would name there son Michael Michaels, Come on mom, think up something original, and don't keep spending our money on your therapy, learn how to drive. Judge, more to come :-)

To: Judge Renq who wrote (445)	3/7/1999 7:18:00 PM
From: Elbos	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 688

TO: Judge Renq (445) Sunday, March 07, 1999 From: Elbos I am a WWWC investor who just joined Silicon Investor today. I had to agree to SI's terms, which include the following: "... agree not to use the service for illegal purposes or for the transmission of material that is unlawful, harassing, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, abusive, threatening, harmful, vulgar, obscene, tortious, improper or otherwise objectionable, or that infringes, or may infringe the intellectual property or other rights of another." Under what kind of an exemption do you write? You call yourself a judge, but you seem to behave not only as a judge, but also as a jury and an executioner as well! If you are a WWWC investor, as you say, why in the world are you doing everything possible to destroy WWWC as a viable investment? If Peter Michaels were to go to jail, how does that benefit you as an investor? How does that benefit me and all of the other investors? If you have the capability to lead WWWC into the 21st Century, why don't you do something CONSTRUCTIVE, and offer yourself for election to the Board of Directors, representing us less-knowledgeable investors? We investors did not invest our money to win a Pyrrhic victory. If you want to sue Peter Michaels, and try to destroy our company, don't claim to be doing so on behalf of the other investors! Such stupidity is certainly not in the best interest of all of us investors. Judge Renq, if you have talent, creativity, ability, vision and skills, please use them in a POSITIVE way, so that we may all support your efforts!!! BE PART OF THE SOLUTION ---- WE ALREADY HAVE ENOUGH PROBLEMS!!!