SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical Analysis - Beginners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: keith massey who wrote (9632)2/28/1999 1:05:00 AM
From: Richard Estes  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12039
 
I might have this statement blow up in my face. But I see no value in A/D analysis. I have heard many logical arguments why they are no longer valid. I can not feed those arguments back, mind is getting old. But since I always saw it as a weak indicator, I said after reading "this sounds right to me".

there should be many other measures that can be applied to market rather than NYSE adv/dec that are more telling. I like Dahl's primary trend. I even use # of new lows, >100 on NYSE amd >150 on naz as a measure, both remove the subjective nature of divergence.



To: keith massey who wrote (9632)2/28/1999 11:17:00 AM
From: Gary H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12039
 
Keith, I've been watching the A/D for some time and when looking back at historical charts, it should be noticed that the present spread has not been this great since 1929.



To: keith massey who wrote (9632)2/28/1999 12:15:00 PM
From: dpl  Respond to of 12039
 
Thanks for the link.

David



To: keith massey who wrote (9632)2/28/1999 2:56:00 PM
From: TA2K  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12039
 
Keith and others, Based on what you know of the past, if the markets have a significant correction, will it be those stocks currently overvalued that primarily take the hit, pretty much leaving alone the ones not overvalued? Or will it be an across the board thing?

Thanks