SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (4213)3/1/1999 8:59:00 AM
From: J.L. Turner  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
Cheeky a ? for you:
Are you a on the beach fatalist or a clueless denial-head? In terms of this post of course.

The President of the United States is at the crossroads. Delay has become
impossible. The best response -- if a crash is inevitable -- is to come
clean even though it means the crash happens early. In the spring instead of
the winter. It is not much comfort but a lot fewer will die. I am a cynical
fellow so I think the most likely response is Davy Crockett. It is too late
to come clean without precipitating the crash, and it will require too much
courage to pull the pin early.

So we will probably see Davy Crockett from our leaders. Clinton will play
Winston Churchill. “We will fight them on the beaches...” Much will be made
of ludicrously inadequate contingency planning. Clueless denial-heads will
draw comfort from all of this, and squawk even louder.

But a new and important faction will emerge, a group I will call the
fatalists.

I know a 76 year old gentleman who is very smart. He is Y2K aware. He
expects a Milne scenario. Even though he has money, he has decided to ignore
the issue. He knows it is coming. He is choosing to give up rather than face
a fate worse than death. “Have you read a novel called On the Beach?” he
asked me. “It was a bestseller written by Nevil Shute a long time ago. It is
about a group of the last people on earth living in Australia after a
nuclear war. The radiation is coming for them and they know it. What could
they do? They prepared to meet their maker. That is how I am going to get
ready for Y2K. I am 76 years old.”

If there are enough denial heads, and Davy Crocketts, and fatalists, we may
hold it together until 2000/01/01, and we will all find out what really
happens. All of the arguments will be settled. I live on the West Coast, so
I will be able to watch the impact circumnavigate the globe. (Will this mean
watching a blackout march inexorably around the world towards me? Will we
get news or silence?)

But we probably will not hold it together even with Davy swinging old Betsy
to the very end. There is too much information getting out to too many of
us. We do not have enough trust in our leadership to believe Davy Crockett
or Winston Churchill. So rational Joe Public wakes up in the spring of 1999.
Suddenly next winter doesn't seem that far away.

Joe gets more than a little concerned. He decides to wander down to the
store and pick up a propane heater. He'll use the VISA, and hope the charge
squeezes through. And, hey, why doesn't he pick up a few sacks of rice while
he's at it? Beat the rush and all that. This is not panic to Joe. This is
rational behavior.

It is so rational that everywhere Joe goes, he meets other people trying to
buy the same things and clutching the same pieces of plastic. Joe starts to
walk more quickly from store to store, and he even finds himself breaking
into a jog down the aisles. Faster and faster... Some places stop accepting
plastic! ATM machines empty... When the public wakes up and behaves
rationally, what then?

Crash.

Whether the computers failing could cause a collapse becomes a moot point. A
rational panic. The invisible hand of Adam Smith pulls the pin on the
problem nine months early. This is the best thing if the crash is
inevitable.

The only bad part about taking it down early if our fate is already sealed?
We never do find out what would have really happened to Davy Crockett. In a
thousand years historians are still arguing about the same old, same old.
(Descendant of Shulman: "We would have made it. It would have been close,
and there would have been failures, but it would have been our finest hour."
Descendent of Milne: "LOL LOL LOL Butthead!")

I repeat what I said from the outset of this post. I find it far easier to
assess what is happening now and to imagine what is going to happen after
the fall than to predict what is going to happen in the next 16 months.
Nobody really knows. This is Tom's take. Speculation. But for me this
scenario plays, and I cannot imagine any other reasonable unfolding of
events. It plays all too well for me.

The whole thing absolutely stuns me. More...
Original post by:
Tom Benjamin on CSy2k
J.L.T.