SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LLCF who wrote (23)3/1/1999 1:15:00 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52153
 
David:

Eye-opening.... yup..... that's the game in modern drug discovery..... automate and spend, nail as many targets as possible during this period where innovation allows.

Biologists know that medicine is in its infancy.

Grab, grab, grab, grab. That's why I say that the nature of the business is going to change, going forward..... markets will be *much* more fragmented, with companies throwing a larger number of products at the market. And, as I've reviewed elsewhere, one should consider enabling patents as "products".

Gonna be fun.

Rick



To: LLCF who wrote (23)3/1/1999 1:37:00 PM
From: Biomaven  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52153
 
David,

I like the methodology and think it's certainly very useful to look projects the way the company probably does... is that where you got the idea to look the value this way?

Precisely. The point is Rick's "old-fashioned way" requires us to estimate the chance of success and the likely market size. Now Novartis knows a lot more about those two numbers than we do, and so if they are spending $100m on a drug that they only own half of, this tells us something interesting about their estimate.

This method is particularly useful when you are dealing with a "real" company with lots of real choices of where to spend their money. A biotech may spend $50m on their own trial just because they see no alternative to plowing ahead - "in for a penny, in for a pound" or maybe more appropriately:

I am in blood
Steeped in so far, that should I wade no more,
Returning were as tedious as go o'er


Peter