SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Laszlo who wrote (14457)3/1/1999 10:21:00 PM
From: WISDOM MILES  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19331
 
Laszlo,

If you really have any question, contact the company and ask them directly.

dcic.com
call 203-380-0910 ext.7000 or InvestorRelations@dcic.com

Nobody here deserves Nonsense.

Let's all try our best to keep this thread the most imformative and serious DCTC discussion board in S.I.

Best Regards,
Wisdom

Stronger than ever. GO DCTC!



To: Laszlo who wrote (14457)3/2/1999 12:46:00 AM
From: James Harold Alton  Respond to of 19331
 
Laszlo, My earlier comments as to the content of the message indicating intent to manipulate our stock price down for the purpose of accumulating at lower prices stands. However after reviewing your posts, I do not find the section I snipped from Dudley's that had your name on it and do not understand how your name ended up on this to start with? As this part appears to be in error I have no problem with apologizing for any confusion this might have caused. As to your claim that "everyone is so defensive about your question concerning whether anyone received shares from DCI" , it appears to me that a good number of the major posters have already come forward and answered a question which appears to me was asked with the intent to discredit the posters here in the first place.

James



To: Laszlo who wrote (14457)3/2/1999 12:59:00 AM
From: Parker Benchley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19331
 
Laszlo,

Ok, I hereby give implied notice and publicly apologize right into giving actual notice. I'm sure I must have said something too...but I'm not getting paid to say this.<G>

Onward,

George




To: Laszlo who wrote (14457)3/2/1999 11:33:00 AM
From: Dudley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19331
 
Dudley, I demand a public apology for attributing that statement to me, or else put the link here to prove that I said it.

Laszlo,

No where do i attribute the quote to you. It was meant to illustrate the breadth of motives behind the posts you had read.

In no way was i trying to immolate you or your question. But if you read the thread over the previous few days you would understand exactly who (Spider Feb. 24) started the rumor, and you would realize how outrageous the accusation was. On Feb. 26th DCI directly addressed this issue in their updated FAQ (see last line Who is Paul?). Despite this, the issue continued to smolder and fill the thread with diaphanous accusations even though the original accusers had long ago left the thread, and their original 'smoking gun'( Paul ) had been directly addressed by DCI management (who included a verbose statement encouraging questions to be addressed directly to the company). So Laszlo, you were the unintended victim of my frayed patience. Fortunately, i am a generous sort when it comes to apologies ...

Mr. Laszlo and the thread.

I apologize for making a statement that unintentionally caused distress to the extent my contrition was demanded.


Laszlo, since we both are 'long' and ultimately voyaging toward the same (not so distant) shore lets grab oars and get to work.

Dudley