SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David C. Burns who wrote (2052)3/2/1999 2:39:00 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 4711
 
I would take the criticism farther than Fowler. Look again at the royal sentence:

Due to inability to market their grain, prairie farmers have been faced for some time with a serious shortage of sums to meet their immediate needs.

Replacing "due" with "owing" might be grammatically correct, but would still leave the sentence seriously overweight. The royal speechwriter should have abandoned pomp and settled for:

Unable to market their grain, prairie farmers have run out of money.

Or perhaps:

Inability to market their grain has reduced the incomes of prairie farmers.

Any other suggestions?



To: David C. Burns who wrote (2052)3/2/1999 6:30:00 AM
From: Edwarda  Respond to of 4711
 
I agree with Steven. Moreover, I can tolerate "owing to" as a way of providing relief from the repetitive use of "because of" when I am editing some else's work and wish to avoid rewriting the text.

I shall not give way on "due to." One has to draw the line somewhere or be lost among the barbarians.



To: David C. Burns who wrote (2052)3/3/1999 6:41:00 AM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 4711
 
I was surprised, when Edwarda objected, to learn that purists object to using "due to" for "because of." Now, I am surprised to learn that "owing to" is acceptable, but "due to" is not. "Due to" means "owing to." I fail to see the difference.