Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (36425)	3/2/1999 3:12:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

No DMA, because their methods violated some basic rules of law that apply to everybody else except the president. I know know that what they really impeached Clinton for (I guess) was this Broadderick incident - however, that was somewhat inadmissable, which is not acceptable. Why bother with a Starr report if you are going to impeach someone on innuendo, claims etc.? Why not just get a bunch of copies of the National Enquirer, and read it and make a decision based on that? No, the purpose of the Starr report was to lay out the crimes that were admissable for impeachment and this story was not. No matter how much I think my neighbor is corrupt, I can't just call the police and lock him up can I? Remember though I live in California which is very liberal and the republicans here are truly a hated group. So, you might get more acceptance elsewhere in the country.