Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PINC - Planet City -- Software and Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ztect who wrote (1255)	3/2/1999 4:36:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Respond to of 1754

Egads, that's some serious allegation, one the SEC can't possibly ignore. It certainly would go along way for accounting on how PINC's share price dramatically moves the few days preceding a press release. Of course I look forward to reading Mr. Kraft's response which I assume will be forthcoming. - Jeff

To: ztect who wrote (1255)	3/2/1999 5:31:00 PM
From: DablocTrader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1754

Ztect, I'm not sure yet whether or not to be thankful for your warnings or not. I certainly do not wish to be a conduit for their hype, and will be on my guard against that happening. I will be watching the coming events carefully, and I'm sure we'll learn quickly if this is a POS, or a real company with significant growth potential. I hate to think that GK is deliberately priming the pump with phony or misleading statements and press releases; for the moment I choose to believe that he may be overly exuberant, and mistakenly had given out dates for upcoming releases that were unrealistic, or should not have been released at all. I'd like to see that change, as there may be some real value to PINC. But apparently, he, and the company, need to exercise a great deal more prudence in the handling of the company PR. and IR. I can't be sure of your motivations on your position with PINC, although I would have to think you were burned by some "hype", or you have some other altruistic reasons for your "warnings", and I appreciate your posting of any valid information that I should take into consideration. However, your "forwarnings" sound highly personal, and I don't appreciate personal threats ("you are forewarned"), I wonder how you have the audacity to post these "warnings", and to take such a "mightier than thou" attitude. However, for the moment, I will make the assumption that your meaning is to be wary of the company information coming from Mr. Kraft, and hopefully not directed at me. I will allow for your clarification. Personal threats just reduce any credibility that you might have, serve no purpose other than being annoying, and are very babyish. dbl