SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (22815)3/2/1999 5:43:00 PM
From: IceShark  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86076
 
Given this demand and supply analysis, I would say, POS is a safer short than tech crap.

P.S. After doing this rigorous thinking, and analysis, is contrarian in me beginning to think that POS may be a safe LONG! -g-


He, he he. Leave it to our MoMo to find something in dumb luck and 'esplain it. That stoopit HAL just says 54 3/4 is bad news one way or the other. I'm still not sure which it is. -g-

I assume you mean safer short than Inutz? While that goes without saying, I think inuts will be set up for a fall once again, but the poots are soooooo expensive unless you go 50% deep into the money.

I'm not sure where to pounce next. Chase hasn't got back to me yet on how to wire the cash advance to my margin account. -vbg-



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (22815)3/2/1999 6:35:00 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86076
 
If you look at a plot of short interest for MU you'd have to be a fool not to stay with your puts ;-) ... I looked it up after I sold and almost bought back the other afternoon before the big letdown <ng>

Shorts won't support it. It will crater ...



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (22815)3/2/1999 8:35:00 PM
From: John Pitera  Respond to of 86076
 
You entrail monger you...Your conclusion is very entertaining...-g-