SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Math Junkie who wrote (28735)3/2/1999 7:23:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Respond to of 70976
 

Richard, >>>"Isn't January - February a time of seasonal weakness for PC makers?"<<<

Yes, but that should have been factored into the quarter's earnings estimates, e.g., Intel made $1.19 last Q, consensus expectation is $1.10 this Q.

>>>Is there
evidence that this is more than seasonal weakness?<<<

MUEI said yesterday that the PC market may have gone on hiatus this Q waiting for the Pentium III, which, they say, and I agree, is normal when a major new CPU chip comes out.

>>>How are the year-on-year
comparisons?<<<

Don't know (2 out of 3 not bad?).

TV



To: Math Junkie who wrote (28735)3/2/1999 7:33:00 PM
From: Michael Bakunin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Sure -- but 1999 is being sold as the big "PC recovery" year, after a slow-or-no revenue growth 1998. IMO, current valuations for everything from the boxmakers to the semis to the semi-eqipments are based on a rebound, not just a return to the previous status quo. The AMAT numbers, for example, are not pretty: -1%, '97-8, -2%, '96-7, not to mention the January (FY99) report. I think the markets are expecting some 40-80% revenue growth numbers out of AMAT, like '94-6; I don't see how those will come unless PCs/etc rebound first.



To: Math Junkie who wrote (28735)3/2/1999 8:08:00 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Respond to of 70976
 
Richard,

Re:Isn't January - February a time of seasonal weakness for PC makers

Yes, and yet every year at this time we see a selloff, as though this was entirely unexpected. If one wants to discredit Efficient Market Theory, they need to look no further than these selloffs.

BK



To: Math Junkie who wrote (28735)3/2/1999 9:27:00 PM
From: Claude  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
You may find the article linked in the following post of interest concerning Intel's PC sales in January. Seems one report on intel's January share was not quite accurate to put it mildly.

Message 8118386

Claude (rhymes with TOAD)