Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Audio and Radio on the Internet- NAVR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Timothy Plageman who wrote (9664)	3/2/1999 8:26:00 PM
From: Peppe	Respond to of 27722

Let's face the music here folks. All of us fellow bench sitters are betting that NAVR will take netRadio public. If this happens anytime soon, we'll have made a decent buck. If Paulson stauls too long and the bloom falls of the net craze, we're screwed. Period. If you need instant gratification, take your money to a local casino and put it all on black at the roulette table. Hell, maybe you'd want to put it on red. Watch the ball spin, and WHAMO !! You're rich or you're broke, in seconds. If you want to draw out the pain and agony of losing your cash,or the anticipation of a 2 bagger, buy more NAVR like the rest of us and grab a seat on the bench. While you wait, you may want to take up a habit like chewing tobacco or something... peppe

To: Timothy Plageman who wrote (9664)	3/2/1999 8:36:00 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27722

I don't see a parallel between a decisionary process and a contractual process---if the wording was that NAVR could not ,per contract,file for a IPO until March,2002 that would be something else. There has NEVER been any pretense that NAVR was moving towards an IPO of NetRadio because they were under a contractual obligation to do so now---so what is the issue here?Max90

To: Timothy Plageman who wrote (9664)	3/2/1999 9:02:00 PM
From: zurdo	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27722

Perhaps they do not have a contractual obligation to file for an IPO until March 2002 in their mind...However, they have led investors to believe that an IPO filing is imminent, and that has created legal exposure, due to the fact that investors would buy stock in reliance on those assertions....I believe they are seriously wrong if they think there is no obligation...I'm sure the SEC would be interested in this matter...