Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ernie de la fuente who wrote (14491)	3/2/1999 8:45:00 PM
From: Ken Salaets	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 19331

>> The person that does point out the decline is castrated here but your "climb" posts are greeted with high fives. Ah, come on, Ern. That ain't true and you know it. The people who get sponged on the way down are those who either see something sinister in every drop of the price, (and/)or those who attempt to trash the stock as an investment, DCI management and/or folks on this thread -- not necessarily in that order -- to keep it going in that direction. Moreover, I don't see too many people five-fingerin' WM. Most of us develop and move in and out of patterns relative to SI, and tend to more or less ignore certain folks' posts (like mine, for example -- ggg) and pay particular attention to a handful others' posts, i.e., those that provide actual information or genuine analysis. Besides, it's human nature to feel deflated when your investment is sinking and to resist efforts to artificially drive it lower. Perhaps that is why SIers react so fervently to those who thrive on kickin' us when we're down, relatively speaking. Perhaps our most glaring fault is assuming that SI really matters one way or the other. Indeed, probably the most sensible move would be to ween ourselves from SI altogether. ggg. Ken (waiting for Barbara's asking price)

To: ernie de la fuente who wrote (14491)	3/2/1999 10:13:00 PM
From: haler	Respond to of 19331

ernie de la fuente- RIGHT ON!!!! I am Long DCTC and a long-time lurker. I have found the RAH RAH posts more then disturbing. And constant predictions of $5 in early Dec '98 then before the Holidays, then New Year, etc. These posts are as detrimental as the SHORT posts, IMHO. And I am Long DCTC. I prefer the posts with facts and not the HYPE, I find the HYPE posts a real turn-off to potential and existing shareholders. Now maybe I will take your flame ernie. I do want to express my appreciation to Joe Medsker for his informative posts, they have been of great value to me. GO GO DCTC!!!! RAH RAH RAH STRONGER THEN EVER ;-)

To: ernie de la fuente who wrote (14491)	3/2/1999 10:31:00 PM
From: WISDOM MILES	Respond to of 19331

Ernie, When you spoke from the south of the Boarder(Canadia that is), I don't know your agenda, nor should I care your agenda. What you said is totally not true. I have been holding and adding DCTC since long time ago. I did add some shares around 2/22/1999,but it was relatively very small compared with my total position in DCTC. One thing you are about right is sometime I do post more when DCTC HAS or is to have SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT. Now is the time! If comparing with your show up here, my posting has been more consistent. And it seems to me you took a very long vacation before your recent show up here. Anyway, you are welcome if you have any informative analysis on DCTC or Honest opinion on it. Stronger than ever. GO DCTC!