SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas G. Busillo who wrote (43420)3/2/1999 11:50:00 PM
From: Thomas G. Busillo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
Great Moments in Journalism: Barron's Reiterates MU Despite Apparent
Inability to Differentiate Between MU and MUEI

interactive.wsj.com

Micron's Shares Head South

Portfolio manager Mark Herskovitz
[manager of the Dreyfus
Technology Fund quoted earlier in the piece] is also bullish on
Micron Technology, a company we recently wrote about (see Weekday
Trader, "Throwing the Chips Out With the Bath Water," February
18).


Nothing against Mr. Herskovitz, but - so what? Congratulations, you
found a money manager who likes MU.

At 54 1/4 it's nearly a third off its high of 79 1/2 -- and about
eight points lower than when we wrote about it nearly two weeks
ago.


Funny how the writer fails to mention that "its high of 79 1/2" [sic]
represented a quadrupling of the stock in the span of 5 months.

Although our original premise -- that demand for chips should hold
steady if PC unit shipments remained strong -- still appears to be
true,


Uh, ma'am, in case you hadn't noticed, your "premise" is a
conditional. Now unless you are miraculously going to prove that PC
unit shipments remain strong in spite of recent news out of the
sector, specifically, CPQ and MUEI, I'd caution you against using any
words that might suggest that you are actually engaging in what we
call "logical reasoning". And considering that the first part of the
piece amounted to nothing more than rounding up money managers who
believe in buying PC-related stocks on the dips, I reiterate my
caution.

...yesterday the company warned that its earnings would fall below
expectations. And Goldman Sachs removed Micron from its prestigious
U.S. Recommended List and cut its rating to Market Outperformer.


You know it's funny. I've been under the impression that it was
Micron Electronics (MUEI) that warned, not Micron Technology (MU).

And if you think that's a Jesuitical distinction, let me ask you this
- do you think MU's IR is going to be happy that you are reporting
that Micron Technology warned?

Now granted, Barron's wasn't the only outlet to make this mistake.

biz.yahoo.com

Tuesday March 2, 1:10 pm Eastern Time

Intel, Micron fall after analyst downgrade
NEW YORK, March 2 (Reuters) - Shares of Intel Corp. (Nasdaq:INTC -
news) and Micron Technology (NYSE:MU - news), a pair of leading chip
makers, were lower early Tuesday afternoon amid fresh evidence of a
broad slowdown in the personal computer industry.

Micron Technology, which is majority owner of direct personal
computer marketer Micron Electronics Inc. (Nasdaq:MUEI - news),
warned Monday that its fiscal second-quarter net income and revenues
would fall short of its first-quarter results because of slower PC
sales.


To their credit, a later article got it right.

Here's a quick lesson in differentiating between a publicly-traded
subsidiary and its publicly-traded majority owner. Get your notebook
out.

Module #1: They have different names.

Example:

"Micron Technology"

"Micron Electronics"

Did you see what happened there? Yes, the first word is the same, but
the second is different.

Module #2: They have different ticker symbols.

Example:

"MU"

"MUEI"

Did you see that? You might have noticed that we have the same sort
of thing going on here in this case. The beginning is similar--the
first two letters are exactly the same--but the end is different.

Fun Exercise for Barron's Weekday Trader Reporter and Editor:

Print this out and see if you can connect the dots.

Use your favorite crayon color!

Micron Electronics MU

Micron Technology MUEI

In a research note, Goldman analyst Frank Wang pointed to some
pricing weakness "and a valuation which discounts strong 2000
earnings." His conclusion: "The stock has clearly moved substantially
higher…and the risk/reward is not as positive…"


You know, I can understand the MU/MUEI confusion (actually, I can't;
I think it's unconscionable for a news organization to do that)...

...but how do you get Frank Wang out of Joe Moore?

Isn't Joe Moore the Goldman analyst on MU?

Dow Jones Newswires
Micron Technology Falls 15% Following Goldman Downgrade
Dow Jones Newswires

No further information is available at this time.

NEW YORK -- Micron Technology Inc.'s (MU) shares shed 15% Friday
after Goldman Sachs & Co. downgraded its rating on the chip maker to
market outperform and removed it from the recommended list.

In a research note, Goldman Sachs analyst Joe Moore said that
although Micron has strong near-term fundamentals and a substantial
production upside that has resulted in lower costs, the company may
encounter contract price reductions in the near-term.

Moore explained that the potential decline in contract prices, which
he expects to fall to about $9.00 from a little more than $9.25 per
chip, is a "slight cloud on the horizon which causes us to take a
slightly more cautious view in light of current valuation"...


So, who is Frank Wang? Is he even the analyst on the hardware group?
Isn't that Laura Conigliaro?

But he still thinks Micron's fundamentals are strong, and the
stock should do well in the long run. We're sticking to our story,
too.


Oh, it's a hell of a story.

Sorry, I have no tolerance for people who have no respect for their
profession.

That piece is an abomination.

Tom



To: Thomas G. Busillo who wrote (43420)3/3/1999 1:02:00 AM
From: Fabeyes  Respond to of 53903
 
>>>Despite that, the Koreans are expected to double their capex this year.>>>

The yields and process transfer at Hyundai prove this to be true.