SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (28778)3/3/1999 11:30:00 AM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Brian, re > AMD recently overtook INTC in terms of market share in the fastest growing segment of the MPU sector.<

That claim extends to PCs sold in retail stores only, as
pointed out in yesterday's correction.

Tuesday March 2 4:18 PM ET

AP Clarifies Intel-Retail-Sales

NEW YORK (AP) - In a Feb. 26 story about retail sales competition in the computer semiconductor industry, The Associated Press quoted the research firm PC Data as reporting that consumers bought
more computers in January with semiconductors made by Advanced Micro Devices than those made by Intel Corp. (Nasdaq:INTC - news)

The PC Data report was based on sales in retail stores only, not including sales made directly by computer manufacturers to
consumers by phone or over the Internet.  

dailynews.yahoo.com

Gottfried



To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (28778)3/3/1999 12:02:00 PM
From: Katherine Derbyshire  Respond to of 70976
 
>>Did you listen to the last CC? J Morgan said they could provide a total 300mm
solution for any chipmanker wanting to go forward.<<

Sure. So what? If you believe press releases, every single member of SEMI is a "leading supplier" of every product it sells. If you believe company executives, every company in the industry strives to provide "total customer solutions," and some of them even offer more complete packages than AMAT does.

I'm not saying that Morgan is wrong, just that I'd want a whole lot more evidence than an offhand comment in a conference call before I argued that AMAT was undervalued.

Katherine



To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (28778)3/3/1999 12:05:00 PM
From: Ian@SI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Brian,

1. AMAT doesn't make all the tools needed for a complete 300mm solution.

2. It hasn't yet proved that the tools it does make are 300mm production capable.

3. The AMD / INTC number was for a small though rapidly growing market segment and represented a single time period. INTC has a track record of squashing competitive threats when it so chooses. Perhaps the Antitrust suit has temporarily yielded a "kinder, gentler" INTC.

JMHO,
Ian.