SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Harmond who wrote (43675)3/3/1999 1:13:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 164684
 
Leases are the same as debt. Even if Wal-Mart owned most of their stores, which I doubt,
it's still a huge capital drain that Amazon doesn't suffer.


William,

First off Walmart does own 92% of their stores. Most of them ended up costing them nothing. They bought farmland at very low prices and saved typically 15 acres for a strip center along side. Once the Walmart store was established, they would sell the remaining 15 acres to a developer for the amount it cost Walmart for the land and their building. You may trust me on that because I tried to buy the adjacent 12 acres Walmart owned next to their superstore. Their real estate department was asking the cost they paid for the entire 75 acres and the cost of construction. I did not buy it but a developer did.

Glenn



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (43675)3/4/1999 3:56:00 AM
From: H James Morris  Respond to of 164684
 
>> Even if Wal-Mart owned most of their stores, which I doubt<<
William get current. Buy one share in Wal-Mart and you'll see that they own almost all of them. Why?? They had the profits and, cash flow to buy them. I must admit the "Thing" has the positive $cash flow but, what about the lack of profits??
You like leverage. I can tell.