Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (36587)	3/3/1999 12:44:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

The feeling is mutual, of course. Still, font of right wing dogma that you are, don't you have a snappy 2 sentence answer as to how the contra drug running through Mena is all Clinton's fault? As to "your boy going down", glad to see you echoing your hero Starr. Oh, I forget, Carville made that up.

To: Neocon who wrote (36587)	3/3/1999 12:49:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Schools Must Fund Nurses for Some Disabled Students By Richard Carelli Associated Press Writer Wednesday, March 3, 1999; 10:50 a.m. EST WASHINGTON –– Federal law requires the nation's public school districts to pay for one-on-one nursing services for some disabled students throughout the school day, the Supreme Court ruled today in the case of an Iowa teen-ager. The court, by a 7-2 vote, said such continuous care is not medical treatment, and therefore must be publicly funded under the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. ... Joining Stevens were Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer. Justices Clarence Thomas and Anthony M. Kennedy dissented. In an opinion by Thomas, they said the decision "blindsides unwary states with fiscal obligations that they could not have anticipated." __________ There he goes again, that "token" Clarence Thomas, the unthinking pawn of Antonin Scalia.

To: Neocon who wrote (36587)	3/3/1999 12:59:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Ok, 3 sentences. JBL brought up Mena, he said "whatever" in reponse to my bringing in the obvious contra association. You chose to second his "whatever" with a gratuitious (but ever so civil, of course) remark about me. You guys are ever so good at dishing it out, but anything comes back your way, boo-hoo.