Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (36679)	3/3/1999 3:16:00 PM
From: iandiareii	Respond to of 67261

brees-- I recall mostly some gleeful rightist posting a countdown to the revelation of "Slick's love-child." Among Clinton supporters, I imagine they still hold him in high enough esteem that planting false, damaging, but highly believable rumors about him, only to have them revealed as canards, would likely constitute Pyrrhic victories, losing investments. As to the term Clintonites, if you were served a plate half filled with bacon and half filled with ham, and remarked "I don't eat bacon", would it then follow that you must necessarily eat ham? So far on this thread, I have limited my comments to "I don't eat bacon." Further affiant sayeth not. ian Also, it seems to me that, in terms of opinions of the opponents in the D.C. struggle, all we know with certainty of Daniel is that he doesn't eat bacon. I may, however, have missed his stated taste for ham.