SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : THNS - Technest Holdings (Prev. FNTN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Fortune III who wrote (11253)3/3/1999 4:41:00 PM
From: Dan Dieffenwierth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15313
 
Bill, I've been having a little trouble the last couple
of days getting on SI. Last time just a few minutes ago.
Hope this helps.



To: Bill Fortune III who wrote (11253)3/3/1999 6:09:00 PM
From: Wally  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15313
 
Bill: I've had a little trouble getting OFF of SI - but then my wife threatened me with a large black pan.
But seriously (and I just was) I just got back in the office today after a week of forced labor in Paris so I don't know from SI's failings this week. I can tell you that I was most pleased to see some of the recent news while I was gone. Most surprising to me was FNTN's announcement of selling their products at this early stage to a second vertical industry. As recently as September of last year market expansion was expected no earlier than this summer. While roll-out has moved at a deliberate pace, the full scope of FNTN's plans appear to be much broader than I originally expected - and some of those plans are actually ahead of schedule.
At this point I am almost more interested in the pace of information rather than the individual content of same - especially when it concerns revenue and revenue centers.
IMO, if FNTN continues on its current path we can look forward to some very surprising (and much deserved) rewards.

Regards,
Wally



To: Bill Fortune III who wrote (11253)3/3/1999 6:10:00 PM
From: Michael Baron  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15313
 
Same here, same message. I chalk it up to the local V.I. telco ("VITELCO", strangely enough) and its really poor service. Maybe not though.

All the best,
M.